Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unveiled critical revisions to the National Emission Standards But now, the EPA has chosen to put corporate profits over our well-being. feels compelled to check – it is absolutely crucial that our vehement opposition to this, and all other rollbacks EPA is accepting comments on this interim final rule through Aug. 1 .  Urge the EPA to reverse this decision and enforce the original, more protective deadlines.

This rollback allows industrial facilities like Edgar Thomson Works to continue emitting dangerous pollutants The EPA claims these delays are necessary because of "industry assertions" about the time needed for If we don’t stand up and resist these rollbacks, we are giving a green light to a future with dirtier You can find the relevant documents by using the Docket ID numbers: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0085 and EPA-HQ-OAR Urge the EPA to Reverse Its Decision:  Demand EPA enforce the original compliance deadlines.

Here’s what’s going on: As you may recall, back in July, we blogged about the EPA’s   proposal to postpone Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, EPA has decided to go ahead with its proposed postponement of the On Dec. 3,EPA published a   rule  in the Federal Register that finalized the postponement that it proposed the postponement of deadlines for standards for coke ovens’ emissions of hazardous air pollutants, EPA “This is yet another decision by EPA to put corporate convenience ahead of public health,” said GASP’

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposal to revoke its own 2009 Endangerment Finding In the 2009 Endangerment Finding, EPA asserted ( for the first time ) that it had the authority to regulate power plants ( ditto ),   airplane engines , and oil and natural gas extraction (an assertion that EPA will no longer be enforceable and there will be no new EPA regulations to control them, for at least EPA’s proposed revocation of the 2009 Endangerment Finding was an entirely predictable result of the

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that would walk back deadlines for phasing down the use of hydrofluorocarbons The EPA on May 26 finalized that rule. Here’s why: In 2015 and 2016, EPA under the Obama Administration promulgated regulations intended to In late 2020, Congress passed a bill that authorized EPA to promulgate regulations to impose a gradual Under the Biden Administration EPA chose to forego the “negotiated rulemaking” and instead promulgated

The EPA press releases were issued like thunderclaps Wednesday afternoon - boom, boom, boom: EPA Announces Action to Implement POTUS’s Termination of Biden-Harris Electric Vehicle Mandate Trump EPA Announces Announces Action to Address Costly Obama, Biden “Climate” Measurements (Social Cost of Carbon) Trump EPA ’s Core Mission EPA Terminates Biden’s Environmental Justice, DEI Arms of Agency Trump EPA Announces And the flurry of EPA releases didn’t address any of that.

Our local EPA office announced in a press release Monday that the agency has approved Pennsylvania's EPA, the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD), and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to improve We also want folks to understand that this type of local progress could be derailed by proposed rollbacks of crucial regulations announced recently by Trump’s EPA.  Help us fight these rollbacks and protect the air we have all fought so hard to clean up.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)   provided a waiver  for California’s emission standards for cars The Biden Administration’s EPA accordingly did not submit the waiver to Congress for review in January The new Congress and President Trump’s EPA have rejected the General Accounting Office’s opinion, maintaining Just one wrinkle: Because the Trump Administration’s EPA appears to have submitted the waiver to Congress

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)   announced  the availability of “presidential exemptions” from Just email the EPA .” The New York Times :  “ E.P.A. The Associated Press:   “ EPA offers industrial polluters a way to avoid rules on mercury, arsenic and chemicals .”; and The Los Angeles Times:   “‘ Inbox from hell’:  Environmental groups outraged after EPA Could the EPA, which writes air quality standards and enforces both them and the Clean Air Act, really

The EPA has announced a proposal to strengthen Clean Air Act standards for large facilities that burn These proposed standards reflect current technologies available to control pollution cost-effectively, EPA Why is EPA taking this action? EPA last revised these standards in 2006. EPA will accept comments on the proposal for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.