Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this week published a proposed rule  to eliminate greenhouse Little bit of background: EPA began requiring certain stationary sources to determine and report their However (and other than for petroleum and natural gas delivery systems), EPA has determined there is Act (or elsewhere) to require sources to report their greenhouse gas emissions, which is the reason EPA EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0186.   Editor’s Note: Stay tuned – we’ll be sharing more guidance on how

Trump’s EPA on Thursday announced the revocation of what’s known as the 2009 Endangerment Finding - Without the Endangerment Finding, the EPA would not have legal authority under Section 202(a) of the It’s clear the EPA has lost its way. The EPA's mission is to protect human health and the environment. Yet the systematic rollback of regulations like the endangerment finding and the willful disregard for

Trump’s EPA on Dec. 1 announced that it is taking final action on the agency's July 2025 Interim Final It’s worth noting that EPA’s press release touted the action “will impact hundreds of thousands of oil industry fiscal considerations over environmental and public health has seemingly become routine in EPA Here’s an excerpt from the release: In July 2025, EPA issued an IFR extending compliance deadlines in remote-sensing technology to provide EPA with data on potential large leaks.

In that blog, we noted EPA’s decision not to quantify human health benefits  that might accrue from reductions EPA’s decision drew protests from environmentalists (one headline, from the New York Times:  “ Trump’ We committed to examining the EPA's decision to determine its validity and provide an update. All of this gives EPA a lot of leeway.    How has EPA used that leeway, you wonder?  Was EPA placing the value of human life at zero when it promulgated those new or revised NSPS?   

Now for something completely different - some GOOD news out of the EPA:   The agency signaled in an Basically, the withdrawal means the EPA is reinstituting the compliance deadlines set forth in the 2024 EPA now says that the data that it received from the coke industry regarding its rates of compliance you did just that: You submitted public comments expressing your vehement opposition to the proposed rollback of the robust public opposition to the rollback.  

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its plan to delay full implementation of the revised Yesterday, EPA announced that it also plans to delay full implementation of the revised NESHAPs for Coke Specifically, EPA plans the following delays to these rules that will apply at Clairton and Monessen: Speaking broadly, EPA is justifying the delays based on assertions that compliance with the regulations “As with the NESHAPs for Integrated Iron and Steel making facilities, EPA has estimated an industry-wide

The Endangerment Finding is the legal prerequisite EPA used to regulate emissions from new motor vehicles Absent the Endangerment Finding, EPA would lack statutory authority under Section 202(a) of the Clean Here’s what Patrick told EPA: Good afternoon. If this proposal goes through, the EPA would lose its authority to regulate climate-altering pollution The EPA’s mission is simple and profound: to protect human health and the environment. Full stop.

Trump’s EPA on Tuesday announced yet another proposal to undermine environmental regulations designed Absent this finding, EPA would lack statutory authority under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA GASP remains deeply concerned with the systematic rollback and repeals of regulations rooted in science “This is a dark age for the EPA,” GASP Executive Director Patrick Campbell said. In the meantime, here’s some coverage of the announcement: EPA moves to repeal finding that underpins

Quick background: The EPA promulgated the Revised Coke Oven NESHAPs in 2024.  Last spring, we   reported  that pursuant to Section 112(i)(4) of the Clean Air Act, EPA offered to delay On July 8, 2025, EPA issued an   interim final rule  that would have extended those compliance deadlines Accordingly, in October we were pleased to   report  that it appeared that EPA would scrap the July 8 Final Rule and go ahead with the original deadlines in the Revised Coke Oven NESHAPs: on Oct. 3, 2025, EPA

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding an interim final rule that would delay compliance deadlines Here's is what GASP Executive Director Patrick Campbell told the EPA: Good morning. The EPA’s mission is to protect human health and the environment. GASP urges the EPA to withdraw this interim final rule immediately.