The Southwestern Pennsylvania Ozone Stakeholder Working Group’s Final Recommendations

Background

GASP has been a stakeholder in the Southwestern Pennsylvania Ozone Stakeholder’s Working Group. The group consists of 27 representative members from industry, regulatory, citizen and environmental groups and has been meeting several days each month in Pi ttsburgh since March 1996 to devise an agreed upon strategy to reduce ozone levels in Western PA.

The Western Pa. Seven County area, (Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington, and Westmoreland) is currently in moderate non-attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. An exceedence of the standard would be any mo nitor reading averaged over a one hour period that exceeds 124 ppb. The SW PA area had 17 exceedences in 1995. Technical modeling analysis was provided by Alpine Geophysics using approved Environmental Protection Agency models and methods. The modeling helped predict what levels of ozone precursor reductions (nitrogen oxides, NOx, and volatile organic compounds, VOCs) would be needed to reach attainment levels. As well, the model indicated how various strategies would effect ozone reductions in the ar ea. Our deliberations were concluded in December 1996.

The idea of a stakeholders group is to find consensus among the most affected and interested parties. Consensus does not necessarily mean unanimity. Some parties may strongly endorse a particular solution while others may accept it as a workable agreemen t. Group members can participate in the consensus without embracing each element of the agreement with the same fervor as other members, or necessarily having each of his or her interests satisfied to the fullest extent. In a consensus agreement, the pa rties recognize that, given the combination of gains and trade-offs in the decision package and given the current circumstances and alternative options, the resulting agreement is the best one the involved parties can make at this time.

The stakeholder recommendations are directed to the PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the PA Department of Transportation. The meetings have been open to the public and you may have read news articles or attended one of the group’s outr each public meetings.

The recommendations are divided into four sub-categories: immediate, near term, episodic, and additional recommendations. (It should be understood that there are also a number of federal measures that will be implemented by 1999 as called for in the Clea n Air Act). The following are the basic stakeholder recommended strategies:

Immediate Control Options (should be implemented within the next year)

On this issue there were minority reports. One member did not endorse the two options but felt RFG should be the selection. Several others had comments on the fallback option (contingency fuel) should the area continue to have ozone exceedences. GASP, the Sierra Club and Arco Chemical were signers to a minority report that stated RFG was selected at the time of the original debate as the contingency fuel and should be the contingency fuel. Others disagreed as to whether this was the groups agreement.

Near Term Recommendations (require more regulatory ground work which will extend the time for implementation):

The Working Group recommended that the following precursor emission reduction measures be implemented to provide a margin for emissions growth and to provide increased assurance the standard will be attained and maintained.

Episodic Measures — (measures targeting high ozone days and not eligible for State Implementation Plan credit):

Additional Recommendations

Develop Analyses to Determine if Reductions may be Needed from Upwind Sources to Achieve Attainment in the Seven-County Nonattainment Area:
The Stakeholders encourage the Ozone Transport Assessment Group (OTAG) process and anticipate regional control strategies. If these do not occur in a reasonable period of time, the Stakeholders encourage the Commonwealth to explore its other options to e ffectively address the transport problem. (the Commonwealth has the ability to sue upwind states over transport issues).

Develop Supplemental Technical Analyses as Provided for in the Modeling Guidance which Demonstrate that within the Uncertainties and Limitations of the Model, the Working Group’s Recommendations Reduce the Magnitude, Frequency, and Geographic Extent of the Ozone Problem Sufficiently to Enable the DEP to Prepare an Attainment Demonstration for Submission to the Environmental Protection Agency.

by Suzanne Seppi, (Ozone Stakeholder, representing GASP)

Group Against Smog and Pollution | gasp@gasp-pgh.org | 412-325-7382
Wightman School Community Building, 5604 Solway Street, #204, Pittsburgh, PA 15217